You typed “AI visibility audit” because you wanted a tool — something that runs, spits out a number, and tells you where you stand. That’s a completely reasonable thing to want, and there’s no shortage of free tools that will do exactly that in under a minute. Point one at your business and you’ll have a score before you finish reading this sentence. The score isn’t the problem. It’s just not the whole job.
Why doesn’t a score tell me what to fix?
Because a score is an output, not a diagnosis. A free checker can tell you that an AI engine named a competitor instead of you — we know, because we ran that exact test on ourselves and published the 0/80. What it won’t tell you is why: which of the dozen possible gaps in your citation graph is actually causing it, which one to close first, and which ones aren’t worth your time yet. That reasoning is genuinely different work from running the scan — it’s the part a script can’t do for you, because it depends on what’s actually true about your specific business. Score alone, you know you have a problem. Score plus reasoning, you know which problem to fix first.
What do I actually get for $30?
The smallest honest step: the same scan a free tool runs — across ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, and Perplexity — plus your top three fixes, ranked, with the reasoning for why each one is in that order. Not a demo, not a call, not a sales pitch. You get the interpretation a free score can’t give you, at a price that isn’t really a decision. If you want the full prioritized roadmap and a citation-share benchmark against the businesses actually getting named instead of you, that’s the $500 audit — but the $30 version is the honest place to start, built the same way we built our own: the method that scored us 0 of 80, pointed at your business instead.